Wednesday, May 13, 2009

No Kids Allowed

I've been fucking around since I was in my early teens. Completely my choice and mostly sought out by me. However, you'll notice I really haven't written anything about those experiences, because I feel that's crossing a line. First, I have no desire to appeal to pedophiles and second, avoiding jail is always a good thing. While I will admit to the occasional impure thought about some hot high school jock, I am definitely NOT into kids.

So why am I bringing this up? Because I recently found that I had about a dozen followers that were pushing kid pictures. I didn't examine the sites closely enough to see if the kids were naked, I found the sites creepy in that they centered around little boys. That makes me physically ill.

I have kids. I have nieces and nephews. I can't imagine doing anything like that to a child. So don't put that shit on my site. To those of you who put crap like that on my site, I'll block you. I'll keep blocking you. Like the idiots that leave comments that are nothing but ads, I will continue to block every comment and every follow. Don't make me come after you.

37 comments:

DamienNZ said...

Here here mate - well done.

Ray's Cowboy said...

I fully agree. I love MEN not children. That is why I post my pictures like I do. I do not mind playing Daddy and boy, but there is a line which one does not cross.
I will have to say I was very ative at 13 as well.
Agree with you very much.
Ray

betoargba said...

Thank you for this post. I completely agree with you. I have just also discovered that many of my latest followers have pics of kids in their blogs. I will check them out and will block them. I don´t want to promote pedophiles through my blog.
Beto

Windy City Sex blog said...

I've noticed a bunch of those guys have signed on to my blog too but they haven't started anything creepy yet. If they do they'll get the boot. I may use your idea and do a blog post also, with credit to you of course.

EM said...

I've also found it disturbing that there's a lot of so-called "gay picture blogs" that have pictures of boys that are barely teens. It really bothers me that it seems to be so...accepted, and that it's labelled as gay content.

I read a lot of blogs and activily search for new interesting blogs and really don't want to see those kind of pictures when entering, what I think is gay oriented blog.

Anonymous said...

if you dont like true freedom then you must report to america. they have many SS agents ready to investigate. hail obama.

(awk)Word said...

@Anonymous: Spelling and punctuation really help--your message would still be idiotic, but it would help.

I suspect you're one of the douche bags I blocked. Good riddance.

DamienNZ said...

Underage Porn is not freedom of speech - it's simply underage porn - and it's still illegal and distasteful.

the whole anon thing is so "gutless hick" I could vomit.

cum.lover said...

I agree with you completely. If the image of the subject makes me wonder whether he is still pubescent, whether he has achieved the legal age of consent, I disavow, repudiate & cast it into the fires of hell: sexual activities & promotions with & about underagers are intolerable.

urtown3 said...

I'm very glad you posted this. Thank you!!
NOW, when are you going to write again??? you said you had a drop....maybe because you quit writing. I love the pics, but your experience stories along with the picture are much more "explosive" for me...
you write in such a way i feel like i was a fly on the wall, and the pictures usually go along with the story.....so fing hot!
write again....please!!
i can't figure the twitter thing out....when i pull it up it seems just like responses to questions or coment we cant see?

lick...
grins

(awk)Word said...

@urtown3 I know... I know... it's just a matter of sitting down and writing everything down (actually, the hard part is then trying to find pictures that 'work' with the text).

I've jotted down a few things in my journal, but haven't committed anything to my computer.

I swear, I'll try!

Thanks for the kind words encouragement!

Guierllmo Vaquero said...

Bro I really appreciate you for taking such a stand. Those guys make me SICK. I love Men who consent to sexual activity. I don't get these guys who feel the need to have sex with kids. There is a difference in role playing where someone is daddy and the other a boy. But the key differnece both or all people involved are consenting adults. Keep up the wonderful posts.

Anonymous said...

Rein@reinstudio.com Said . . .

I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOUR STATEMENT! I'm a professional artist; simply the idea of exploiting children sicken me. I have no understanding of it at all. One would think that there could be no " . . . NO, but then again . . ." but there is.

When I was at the university studying art, I ran across an incredible photographer who concentrated on the nude. When I got into the book there were a couple of picture of nude parents with their equally nude children. It was some of the most beautiful photography I'd ever seen and it was pure art. There was nothing exploitive about it.

I guess I'm throwing this out there because there are delicate lines out there. I personally know, as an artist, that I've drop ideas because of the fear that someone would think I was being exploitive. I look at a THE WATERING HOLE by Thomas Eakins and ask myself . . . was that being exploitive?

None of this, however, undermines . . . in my mind . . . your initial post. I heartedly agreement with it. But that only leads to another area: this fascination with "twinks." What are twinks but men-looking-like-boys with big dicks???

cum.lover said...

Twinks hold no sexual interest for me at all. I find it puzzling how any seemingly red-blooded adult man str8 or bi or gay can be attracted to that genre. Ugh!

(awk)Word said...

@Rein I understand what you mean about the fine line. Art is generally not supposed to arouse, but to get you to explore or understand the subject. However, there is erotic art... so, art isn't supposed to arouse... unless it is.

My point isn't about art or eroticism as it is about kids. I believe it is wrong to eroticize kids.

Anonymous said...

BRAVO!

Dwight Supremacy said...

Amen to that!

Pegos na Cam said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Sir's boy said...

boy so so with you brother. Those fucker pissed me off. There was no reason for those collections of images but to satisfy somew sick desired individuals. It is the right of children to protect thier innocense and the duty of every adult to make sure it happens. boy turned thme all into gblogger and kicked them off the sight and blocked them out.

David said...

Here, here, I totally agree with you mate. Consenting adults are perfectly cool but when it's kids...eewwwuhhh that's wretchedly disgusting and bad form to boot.

Anonymous said...

I completely agree with your statement! Well said and keeping banning those sickos !

dainty phat man said...

Thanks for this post, man. Can you notify the police? Child abuse is a crime, and it's our responsibility, as adults, to protect all children.

My apologies for being such a bitch of a man, but I too often deal with the consequences of pedophilia to be silent.

(awk)Word said...

Dainty Phat Man: Technically, they are doing nothing wrong from a legal standpoint. The kids aren't naked, they are in swimsuits, shorts, etc. It's the way they are presented that I find creepy.

Duplicity said...

Thank you so much for posting your comments about blogs that contain kid pics. I was shocked, upset, and finally paranoid when I discovered the proliferation of kiddie images on blogger. I agree that gay content on blogger should promote healthy sexuality - I wanted to flag some of the blogs but was surprised to find that they did not fit any of the categories. I will be vigilant, though, and not hesitate to report to blogger material I find offensive. Great blog, btw. Keep it up!

Sperm-My-Cumhole said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Sperm-My-Cumhole said...

Hey there! I left the deleted cocmment, I deleted it myself. As I noticed a typo, I accidentally left out an 't. Which greatly altered the tone of what it had to say! Here is comment again in full, including the missing 't!

I have 2 say, I was very active in my early teens and actively sought out guys to have sex with. But it's wasn't until I was 17 that I lost my virginity (went all the way and received anal sex). I like older guys and can't abide child pornography. I even try and avoid featuring twinks in my blog, cause u never can be 100% certain.

I'm pleased to report, I haven't been plagued with these idiots and their fucked up perversion. It really casts a shadow on gay men. After all their r idiots out there who can't make the distinction between homosexuality and pedophilia.

One point which was made I found particularly interesting. It's not illegal/not porn, because the kids aren't naked. Their wearing shorts, swimming trunks or whatever. That shudn't be an issue. I have a slideshow of guys in underwear on my blog, I'm confident all the guys have reached the age of consent. My point is porn is porn, it doesn't matter how u try and dress it up. Or what loophopes u find to justify it.

Child pornography and pedophilia r really sick, and the people who propagate and indulge in such activities shud be punished. There shudn't be legal loophopes, 4 them to hide behind!

Love ur blog, great and thought provoking post. Kudos!

Mundoloco said...

It's interesting to read your post cause I for some while have been blocking some "kid" followers with strange names. I've blocked 50 so far.

Their content is mostly of the images you've described, all much alike. It seems as if they are all from a circle os blogs spreading around our blogs, for some purpose.

They are all from "BLEEDING QUEERS!"

which is kind of a wierd name.

Something tells me its de Interpol, for all I know, scooping to find and tag the pedophiles on Blogspot.

(awk)Word said...

@Sperm-My-Cumhole: While I agree that technically, what they are posting is not illegal--but it's the way they are promoting them is voyeuristic and I find it creepy.

I, too, started young--but that was MY decision. These kids aren't involved in these sites--it's like the dirty old man jerking off in the car across the street from the park. I can't justify it and I won't promote it.

@Mundoloco Fight the good fight, brother!

KEPLER23BCN said...

Here Here mate.

completely agree.

gaybarcelonaporn3.blogspot.com

One kisss

Anonymous said...

I love this game :)

Anonymous said...

Hi all, my best partner only just informed myself relating to this site I really thought i would appear and take a appear and expose my own self, Looks an excellent site with a a lot of open subscribers!

(awk)Word said...

Anonymous: Whatever you're taking, drop the dosage...

Anonymous said...

how many time i do not do what i want to do but do what i dont want to do

(awk)Word said...

Anonymous... I don't know what the fuck that means, but it made me laugh, so I'm posting it.

Anonymous said...

Hey there

(awk)Word said...

Hey, yourself...

Anonymous said...

Hiya, I'm really glad I've found this info. Nowadays bloggers publish only about gossip and web stuff and this is actually frustrating. A good blog with interesting content, that is what I need. Thank you for making this site, and I'll be visiting again. Do you do newsletters? I Cant find it.